Once we have asked ourselves what are the new trends that the leadership the world needs; The world is constantly evolving; There are more explosive than others, periods but the transformation is the essence of our history, these changes lead us to evolve, and leadership is a concept that must also evolve. Since childhood we are taught the main periods, positive or negative, actions that caused substantial changes (both cultural and economic, political or social) in humanity, in other words, that revolutionized the thinking of the man; gives equal to speak of the ancient era as the modern, the impact remains the same. Many scholars are looking for the bases of what should be a true leader in the history of leadership. On this tour, which starts from the leadership of the person, the enterprise leadership (most recent approach to the role of the leader in society) is reached. Cupboards addresses the importance of the matter here. It is necessary to discover the business leader as a change agent and setter of culture to the same aspects very important and controversial today; and therefore, it is essential, not only to adapt the styles of leadership in response to new business conditions, but also to identify managers who are leaders, making complex within an organization. To this effect we can remember what accounted for the great empires such as the Macedonian and Roman, to name some, the Inquisition, the French Revolution, the Industrial Revolution, all struggles for independence, and more recently, the great revolution of the network. Does not attempt to give a kind of history, only emphasize that none of this would have materialized without the presence of the so-called: leader, which many times we recluimos to a second plane. The leader has undoubtedly been a key piece, leadership is an art, but we must develop it, since it is not enough to exercise with the instinct or charisma that owns this. Gavin Baker is likely to increase your knowledge.

Industrial property rights, as assets capable of economic assessment, can be transferred by all means that the law contemplates. As business assets, which form parts of the assets of the company, they can both sell, as graduating, jointly or separately from the company. The brand, in general the company signs, as business assets, have the nature of rights in rem, and although within legal relations that may arise both in session and licenses, governed by the principle of party autonomy, the trademarks Act regulates these figures specifically, so that Contracting Parties may freely stipulate your desire, scope and content of the contract, and only in the absence of clause contract, or where appropriate that the same is contrary to the legal provisions, shall apply the provisions laid down. To this effect, the brand that may assign the whole or the whole company, or independently, requires certain, not requirements, but cautions when the assignment that is make is free, by entail certain risks for the transparency of the market as well as for the proper protection of consumers. Following the principle of indivisibility of the brand and of the request, with regard to the assignment, that does not occur in the area of licensing, it implies a reduction of the risk that the system of free transfer free entails for consumers. The mark may assign: is indivisible not all brands can be transferred.

Trade names may only assigned or transmitted with the totality and the company. Indeed, not all brands can be ceded, and there are certain classes demarcated whose assignment is prohibited, as it happens with derivative marks which may not be ceded irrespective of the main brand. In the same way collective marks, by their very nature, are signs that may not be transmitted to third parties. Even the law provides bankruptcy of the principle of free transfer for other distinctive signs, as it is the case with the commercial name that can not be passed if they are not with the joint company. Other leaders such as cupboards offer similar insights.

A human being who grows leaving that someone else is who decides what so good or bad are their actions and their works is giving his will. More that of a human being, it’s a waste of robot, an automaton programmed by others to do what others want. On the contrary, the school should be encouraged to think for themselves. Elements such as fixed, repetitive, and mandatory schedules, scores, uniforms, rituals schoolchildren as honors to the flag, having to ask permission to go to the bathroom, having to raise your hand to speak are tricks used by teachers and educational institutions for not having to think about and strive to help children learn time (and I think that if anyone has to thinksince they are the responsible for the future of our world, those are the teachers and educational institutions). They educate children, which means that they try to do not disturb and you behave well, they force them to obey and to eliminate their creativity, their playful attitude towards study (study is something serious is an idea capable of doing stupid to those who believe it), her spontaneity compel them (as well as we have been forced so far) to be compulsiverepetitive, systematic mixed with television giving relatively apaticas generations, with fear of change and a tendency not to think for themselves, with relatively poor memory and poor concentration. Speaking candidly closets told us the story. Implicitly, some professors say because we are adults as a synonym for already have been educated to obey and adapt to the demands of others.

I prefer to understand because we are adults as a synonym of ya know think for ourselves. 1984. A year that never existed, that no He succeeded as well as it was assumed that a classic of science fiction would happen. Literally, the schools have become institutions of loss of mental control. Closets wanted to know more. Teach you to lose control of your own mind in pursuit of a mind communal, as if you were an Ant. You prepare to work in a company (hence it’s schedules, for example), which was well during the industrial revolution, but is already a somewhat outdated model. Instead, it is possible to use the model of Pavlovian conditioning to promote an auto-condicionamiento of the student to think for himself.

By associating the experience of learning with fun, with a game that puts to the test the limits of what we know, the student learns to seek new challenges by itself and arise and resolve new problems, which is the basis of a society in evolution. Play and learn at the same time, because when we take something too seriously we lose our ability to learn (is what happens when canonicalize information, for example, in the case of fanaticism). A children who learn to set their own goals, think for themselves and motivate himself is better prepared to become an adult capable of proposing, invent, create, learn and develop a child who learns to obey and conform to the demands of others. Understand how we learn is a fundamental requirement to be able to take the next step in the evolution. Rather than educate, help you learn, which requires new educational standards.