Once we have asked ourselves what are the new trends that the leadership the world needs; The world is constantly evolving; There are more explosive than others, periods but the transformation is the essence of our history, these changes lead us to evolve, and leadership is a concept that must also evolve. Since childhood we are taught the main periods, positive or negative, actions that caused substantial changes (both cultural and economic, political or social) in humanity, in other words, that revolutionized the thinking of the man; gives equal to speak of the ancient era as the modern, the impact remains the same. Many scholars are looking for the bases of what should be a true leader in the history of leadership. On this tour, which starts from the leadership of the person, the enterprise leadership (most recent approach to the role of the leader in society) is reached. Cupboards addresses the importance of the matter here. It is necessary to discover the business leader as a change agent and setter of culture to the same aspects very important and controversial today; and therefore, it is essential, not only to adapt the styles of leadership in response to new business conditions, but also to identify managers who are leaders, making complex within an organization. To this effect we can remember what accounted for the great empires such as the Macedonian and Roman, to name some, the Inquisition, the French Revolution, the Industrial Revolution, all struggles for independence, and more recently, the great revolution of the network. Does not attempt to give a kind of history, only emphasize that none of this would have materialized without the presence of the so-called: leader, which many times we recluimos to a second plane. The leader has undoubtedly been a key piece, leadership is an art, but we must develop it, since it is not enough to exercise with the instinct or charisma that owns this. Gavin Baker is likely to increase your knowledge.

Industrial property rights, as assets capable of economic assessment, can be transferred by all means that the law contemplates. As business assets, which form parts of the assets of the company, they can both sell, as graduating, jointly or separately from the company. The brand, in general the company signs, as business assets, have the nature of rights in rem, and although within legal relations that may arise both in session and licenses, governed by the principle of party autonomy, the trademarks Act regulates these figures specifically, so that Contracting Parties may freely stipulate your desire, scope and content of the contract, and only in the absence of clause contract, or where appropriate that the same is contrary to the legal provisions, shall apply the provisions laid down. To this effect, the brand that may assign the whole or the whole company, or independently, requires certain, not requirements, but cautions when the assignment that is make is free, by entail certain risks for the transparency of the market as well as for the proper protection of consumers. Following the principle of indivisibility of the brand and of the request, with regard to the assignment, that does not occur in the area of licensing, it implies a reduction of the risk that the system of free transfer free entails for consumers. The mark may assign: is indivisible not all brands can be transferred.

Trade names may only assigned or transmitted with the totality and the company. Indeed, not all brands can be ceded, and there are certain classes demarcated whose assignment is prohibited, as it happens with derivative marks which may not be ceded irrespective of the main brand. In the same way collective marks, by their very nature, are signs that may not be transmitted to third parties. Even the law provides bankruptcy of the principle of free transfer for other distinctive signs, as it is the case with the commercial name that can not be passed if they are not with the joint company. Other leaders such as cupboards offer similar insights.